Skip to main content

Is The Bible Reliable?


Over the past 2,000 years the Bible has been the most scrutinized ancient text out of every written work in the history of man. To this very day nobody has uncovered evidence that disproves it's accuracy, validity, or authority. Skeptics and scoffers have always existed, and the Bible has remained trustworthy despite the numerous attempts throughout history to discredit it.

Isaiah 40:8- "The grass withers and the flowers fall, but the word of our God endures forever.

"The Logical Argument for the Inspiration of Scripture:

Charles Wesley, a famous hymn writer and theologian from the 1700's proposed this logical argument supporting the inspiration of Scripture.

The Bible must have come from 1 of 3 different sources:

1. Good men
2. Bad men
3. God

 The Bible could not have come from good men because they would be considered liars by claiming the Bible was written by God, when they themselves knew it was invented by them.

The Bible could not have come from bad men because they would be inclined to make a book that allows them to do bad, not a book that commands them to do good, forbids all sin, and banishes the wicked to hell for doing bad things. 

Therefore the Bible was inspired by God. Only God would create a book which claims to be written by God, commands all men to do good,  forbids all sin, and banishes the wicked to hell. It makes no logical sense for either good or bad men to create such a book.

Further affirmation: Fulfilled Prophecy, Archaeological Support, and Historical Evidence:

1. Fulfilled Prophecy:

A Biblical researcher named Hugh Ross wrote that he counted around 2500 total prophecies in the Bible of which 2000 of them have been fulfilled to the tee. The remaining 500 are all interconnected and could be fulfilled within a very brief period of time. Some of the major fulfilled prophecies include:

-The Prophecies of Babylon, Nineveh, Tyre and Edom
-Babylon Will Rule Over Judah for 70 Years
-Babylon's Gates Will Open for Cyrus
-Babylon's Kingdom Will Be Permanently Overthrown
-Babylon Will Be Reduced to Swampland
-The Jews Will Survive Babylonian Rule and Return Home
-The Ninevites Will Be Drunk in Their Final Hours
-Nineveh Will Be Destroyed By Fire
-Tyre Will Be Attacked By Many Nations
-Tyre's Stones, Timber and Soil Will Be Cast Into the Sea
-The Jews Will Avenge the Edomites
-Edom Will Be Toppled and Humbled

Isaiah 43:5-6 and Zechariah 8:7-8 are two primary prophecies that were fulfilled in 1948 when Israel became a nation once again. No other nation in the world has been disbanded and reunited as Israel was, especially fulfilling a prediction made over 2,000 years ago.

353 Biblical prophecies were perfectly fulfilled in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, these include:

-21 in Genesis
-10 in Exodus
-7 in Leviticus
-3 in Numbers
-5 in Deuteronomy
-1 in Joshua
-1 in Ruth
-2 in 1 Samuel
-4 in 2 Samuel
-1 in in 2 Kings
-3 in 1 Chronicles
-2 in Job
-102 in Psalms
-2 in Proverbs
-1 in Song of Songs
-125 in Isaiah
-5 in Jeremiah
-2 in Ezekiel
-12 in Daniel
-2 in Hosea
-1 in Joel
-1 in Jonah
-3 in Micah
-2 in Haggai
-29 in Zechariah
-6 in Malachi

Professor Emeritus of Science at Westmont College, Peter Stoner, has calculated the probability of one man fulfilling just 8 of the major prophecies made concerning the Messiah. The estimates were worked out by twelve different classes representing some 600 university students.

The calculations came out to be 1 in 1017. That's chances of 1 in 100 quadrillion! Stoner explains that those odds are comparable to filling the state of Texas with silver dollars 2 feet deep, taking a silver dollar with an X mark on it and randomly dropping it somewhere in the state. Then you would blindfold yourself and randomly reach into the pile and grab the exact same coin. This what statisticians call "operationally impossible." And that is only using 8 of the 353 prophecies regarding Jesus!

2. Archaeological Support:

When an Ancient book makes certain claims about certain historical locations, and evidence from Archaeology confirms the claims made in that book, it serves to support the books overall reliability. The Bible has been confirmed to be reliable in many different ways regarding archaeology, here are a few:

Support #1:
Luke, the author of the Gospel of Luke and Acts, has been proven accurate by archaeology in regards to 32 references to countries, 54 cities, and 9 islands. That's 95 different references, all of which have been supported by archaeology.
Support #2:
John, the author of the Gospel of John, 1-3 John, and Revelation, mentions in his Gospel that near the Pool of Bethesda there are 5 porches. For years, archaeologists believed John to be wrong. No such place had been discovered. But recently, 40 feet under ground, 5 porches were discovered.
Support #3:
There are 25,000 sites that show connection with the Old Testament that have been located in the lands of the Bible.

3.) Historical Evidence:

Support #1:
The most ancient textual evidence we have is a portion of the Gospel of John and Mark, on ancient paper called papyrus, John is dated just after 100 AD, Mark is dated closer to 84 AD. There is also a Magdalen fragment from Mat. 26 believed by some to be within a few years of Jesus' death; Gospel fragments found among the Dead Sea Scrolls dated as early as 50 A.D. No other ancient document enjoys such compelling manuscript evidence.
Support #2:
Bible translators have access to over 5,000 Greek manuscripts, 10,000 Latin and 9,000 other--totaling over 24,000 manuscript copies or portions of the New Testament when translating into modern English. With the earliest one dating within a few years of the death of Jesus.

On the other hand when comparing to other historical documents we see a vast difference:
Secular Manuscripts
 Author
 Date Written
 Earliest Copy
 Time Span
 Copies (extent)
 Herodotus (History)
 480 - 425 BC
 900 AD
 1,300 Years
 8
 Thucydides (History)
 460 - 400 BC
 900 AD
 1,300 Years
 ?
Aristotle (Philosopher)
 384 - 332 BC
 1,100 AD
 1,400 Years
 5
 Caesar (History)
 100 - 44 BC
 900 AD
1,000 Years 
 10
 Pliny (History)
 61 - 113 AD
 850 AD
750 Years 
 7
 Suetonius (Roman History)
 70 - 140 AD
 950 AD
800 Years 
 ?
 Tacitus (Greek History)
 100 AD
 1,100 AD
 1,000 Years
 20
Support # 3:
We now have a total of 616 Old Testament manuscripts available for translation. During the early 1900's the validity of the Old Testament was debated because the majority of our Old Testament scriptures were translated from manuscripts called the "Masoretic Text." The oldest Hebrew text of the Old Testament was the Masoretic Aleppo Codex which dates to A.D. 935. Many skeptics proposed that because of the large time gap between the manuscripts and the Bible days we cannot trust that the Masoretic text is completely accurate.

However, the debate ended in 1947 when a Shepard in Israel was searching for his goat and stumbled upon an ancient cave that contained scrolls of the Old Testament. After these artifacts were tested the scrolls dated as early as 300 B.C. to the first century A.D. These scrolls became known as the Dead Sea Scrolls and when they were compared to our modern Old Testament translations the contents were virtually identical. The only variations between the two were insignificant spelling corrections. 
Conclusion:
Based upon the logical evidence, fulfilled prophecy, archaeological evidence, and historical evidence we can rest assure that the Bible remains reliable to this very day. No other ancient text enjoys such an overwhelming amount of support. The most powerful evidence of the inspiration of the Bible are the billions of changed lives over the centuries which point to the power of a risen Savior. God bless!

Written by: Kyle Bailey, M.Th.

For more inspirational content SUBSCRIBE to my YouTube channel.

image credit to: http://www.reasons.org/articles/embracing-scrutiny
Click below for my video teaching on this topic:
Part 1
Part 2
other sources:
1
2
3
4
5

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A letter to Modern Christians on Church Attendance...

On March 22nd of 2020 an unprecedented event occurred. This wasn't the first time that a widespread disease afflicted human-kind, nor was it the first time that health measures were taken by a human government in order to mitigate the risk of an epidemic. The unprecedented event that occurred on Sunday, March 22nd of 2020 was the physical absence of worshippers gathering as the visible Church of Jesus Christ in the United States as well as other places around the world. The 10 person gathering limit issued by the Centers for Disease Control led to the widespread closure of house's of worship across the country. Up to that point in Church History there had never been an example of this magnitude in which faithful Christians avoided the physical gathering together to worship Jesus Christ and study His Word in a community of fellowship. The typical reason offered by many Christian leaders in an attempt to justify the temporary closure of churches was something like this, "Chr

Is it ok to let your kids believe in Santa Claus?

"A wink of his eye, and a twist of his head, soon led me to know I had nothing to dread."- Twas' the Night Before Christmas, Clement C. Moore As a kid I was taught that Santa Claus was going to bring me the presents I wished for on Christmas morning. I watched movies and cartoons about Santa riding his sleigh with gifts to give to all of the children around the world. Some of the stories depicted Santa as giving coal to bad kids and toys to good kids and I was told jokingly by my parents that I would "receive coal if I was bad," but it was never made to be a serious threat. Up until around the age of seven I really believed that Santa magically came down the chimney and left presents for my brothers and I, and it never caused me to have any resentment toward my parents for telling me he was real. I saw it as my parents wanting to give me a fun Christmas adventure, a magical experience that my brothers and I could use our imagination with. As I learned

How should Christians respond to "cancel culture?"

With the rise of modern technology and social media platforms in the past decade or so we have seen a vast increase certain ideological groups seeking to cancel, ban, and silence those with different, offensive, or annoying opinions. Most of this has been done in the name of seeking to preserve a "safe environment" for people to engage the internet with less of a risk of being "triggered" by a differing opinion. Though on a historical level the ability to limit certain free speech that incites physical violence or destructive behavior has been pretty much agreed upon by most people. It seems clear that the idea that those who say things which are wrong, offensive, or annoying should be canceled, silenced and sidelined is entirely un-American and ultimately not Christian.  Cancel culture is demonic and oppressive. It's the same tactic used by the enemy to oppose the gospel around the world. The message of the cross is offensive to those who don't