Skip to main content

Is The Bible Reliable?

Over the past 2,000 years the Bible has been the most scrutinized ancient text out of every written work in the history of man. To this very day nobody has uncovered evidence that disproves it's accuracy, validity, or authority. Skeptics and scoffers have always existed, and the Bible has remained trustworthy despite the numerous attempts throughout history to discredit it.

Isaiah 40:8- "The grass withers and the flowers fall, but the word of our God endures forever.

"The Logical Argument for the Inspiration of Scripture:

Charles Wesley, a famous hymn writer and theologian from the 1700's proposed this logical argument supporting the inspiration of Scripture.

The Bible must have come from 1 of 3 different sources:

1. Good men
2. Bad men
3. God

 The Bible could not have come from good men because they would be considered liars by claiming the Bible was written by God, when they themselves knew it was invented by them.

The Bible could not have come from bad men because they would be inclined to make a book that allows them to do bad, not a book that commands them to do good, forbids all sin, and banishes the wicked to hell for doing bad things. 

Therefore the Bible was inspired by God. Only God would create a book which claims to be written by God, commands all men to do good,  forbids all sin, and banishes the wicked to hell. It makes no logical sense for either good or bad men to create such a book.

Further affirmation: Fulfilled Prophecy, Archaeological Support, and Historical Evidence:

1. Fulfilled Prophecy:

A Biblical researcher named Hugh Ross wrote that he counted around 2500 total prophecies in the Bible of which 2000 of them have been fulfilled to the tee. The remaining 500 are all interconnected and could be fulfilled within a very brief period of time. Some of the major fulfilled prophecies include:

-The Prophecies of Babylon, Nineveh, Tyre and Edom
-Babylon Will Rule Over Judah for 70 Years
-Babylon's Gates Will Open for Cyrus
-Babylon's Kingdom Will Be Permanently Overthrown
-Babylon Will Be Reduced to Swampland
-The Jews Will Survive Babylonian Rule and Return Home
-The Ninevites Will Be Drunk in Their Final Hours
-Nineveh Will Be Destroyed By Fire
-Tyre Will Be Attacked By Many Nations
-Tyre's Stones, Timber and Soil Will Be Cast Into the Sea
-The Jews Will Avenge the Edomites
-Edom Will Be Toppled and Humbled

Isaiah 43:5-6 and Zechariah 8:7-8 are two primary prophecies that were fulfilled in 1948 when Israel became a nation once again. No other nation in the world has been disbanded and reunited as Israel was, especially fulfilling a prediction made over 2,000 years ago.

353 Biblical prophecies were perfectly fulfilled in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, these include:

-21 in Genesis
-10 in Exodus
-7 in Leviticus
-3 in Numbers
-5 in Deuteronomy
-1 in Joshua
-1 in Ruth
-2 in 1 Samuel
-4 in 2 Samuel
-1 in in 2 Kings
-3 in 1 Chronicles
-2 in Job
-102 in Psalms
-2 in Proverbs
-1 in Song of Songs
-125 in Isaiah
-5 in Jeremiah
-2 in Ezekiel
-12 in Daniel
-2 in Hosea
-1 in Joel
-1 in Jonah
-3 in Micah
-2 in Haggai
-29 in Zechariah
-6 in Malachi

Professor Emeritus of Science at Westmont College, Peter Stoner, has calculated the probability of one man fulfilling just 8 of the major prophecies made concerning the Messiah. The estimates were worked out by twelve different classes representing some 600 university students.

The calculations came out to be 1 in 1017. That's chances of 1 in 100 quadrillion! Stoner explains that those odds are comparable to filling the state of Texas with silver dollars 2 feet deep, taking a silver dollar with an X mark on it and randomly dropping it somewhere in the state. Then you would blindfold yourself and randomly reach into the pile and grab the exact same coin. This what statisticians call "operationally impossible." And that is only using 8 of the 353 prophecies regarding Jesus!

2. Archaeological Support:

When an Ancient book makes certain claims about certain historical locations, and evidence from Archaeology confirms the claims made in that book, it serves to support the books overall reliability. The Bible has been confirmed to be reliable in many different ways regarding archaeology, here are a few:

Support #1:
Luke, the author of the Gospel of Luke and Acts, has been proven accurate by archaeology in regards to 32 references to countries, 54 cities, and 9 islands. That's 95 different references, all of which have been supported by archaeology.
Support #2:
John, the author of the Gospel of John, 1-3 John, and Revelation, mentions in his Gospel that near the Pool of Bethesda there are 5 porches. For years, archaeologists believed John to be wrong. No such place had been discovered. But recently, 40 feet under ground, 5 porches were discovered.
Support #3:
There are 25,000 sites that show connection with the Old Testament that have been located in the lands of the Bible.

3.) Historical Evidence:

Support #1:
The most ancient textual evidence we have is a portion of the Gospel of John and Mark, on ancient paper called papyrus, John is dated just after 100 AD, Mark is dated closer to 84 AD. There is also a Magdalen fragment from Mat. 26 believed by some to be within a few years of Jesus' death; Gospel fragments found among the Dead Sea Scrolls dated as early as 50 A.D. No other ancient document enjoys such compelling manuscript evidence.
Support #2:
Bible translators have access to over 5,000 Greek manuscripts, 10,000 Latin and 9,000 other--totaling over 24,000 manuscript copies or portions of the New Testament when translating into modern English. With the earliest one dating within a few years of the death of Jesus.

On the other hand when comparing to other historical documents we see a vast difference:
Secular Manuscripts
 Date Written
 Earliest Copy
 Time Span
 Copies (extent)
 Herodotus (History)
 480 - 425 BC
 900 AD
 1,300 Years
 Thucydides (History)
 460 - 400 BC
 900 AD
 1,300 Years
Aristotle (Philosopher)
 384 - 332 BC
 1,100 AD
 1,400 Years
 Caesar (History)
 100 - 44 BC
 900 AD
1,000 Years 
 Pliny (History)
 61 - 113 AD
 850 AD
750 Years 
 Suetonius (Roman History)
 70 - 140 AD
 950 AD
800 Years 
 Tacitus (Greek History)
 100 AD
 1,100 AD
 1,000 Years
Support # 3:
We now have a total of 616 Old Testament manuscripts available for translation. During the early 1900's the validity of the Old Testament was debated because the majority of our Old Testament scriptures were translated from manuscripts called the "Masoretic Text." The oldest Hebrew text of the Old Testament was the Masoretic Aleppo Codex which dates to A.D. 935. Many skeptics proposed that because of the large time gap between the manuscripts and the Bible days we cannot trust that the Masoretic text is completely accurate.

However, the debate ended in 1947 when a Shepard in Israel was searching for his goat and stumbled upon an ancient cave that contained scrolls of the Old Testament. After these artifacts were tested the scrolls dated as early as 300 B.C. to the first century A.D. These scrolls became known as the Dead Sea Scrolls and when they were compared to our modern Old Testament translations the contents were virtually identical. The only variations between the two were insignificant spelling corrections. 
Based upon the logical evidence, fulfilled prophecy, archaeological evidence, and historical evidence we can rest assure that the Bible remains reliable to this very day. No other ancient text enjoys such an overwhelming amount of support. The most powerful evidence of the inspiration of the Bible are the billions of changed lives over the centuries which point to the power of a risen Savior. God bless!

Written by: Kyle Bailey, M.Th.

For more inspirational content SUBSCRIBE to my YouTube channel.

image credit to:
Click below for my video teaching on this topic:
Part 1
Part 2
other sources:


Popular posts from this blog

The Storm on Your Phone: learning to fix our eyes on Jesus in the age of social media.

Matthew‬ ‭14:25‭-‬31‬ ‭NIV‬- “[25] Shortly before dawn Jesus went out to them, walking on the lake. [26] When the disciples saw him walking on the lake, they were terrified. “It’s a ghost,” they said, and cried out in fear. [27] But Jesus immediately said to them: “Take courage! It is I. Don’t be afraid.” [28] “Lord, if it’s you,” Peter replied, “tell me to come to you on the water.” [29] “Come,” he said. Then Peter got down out of the boat, walked on the water and came toward Jesus. [30] But when he saw the wind, he was afraid and, beginning to sink, cried out, “Lord, save me!” [31] Immediately Jesus reached out his hand and caught him. “You of little faith,” he said, “why did you doubt?” During one of the most climactic moments of Jesus' ministry, the Apostle Peter demonstrated a dazzling expression of faith and power. Moments after stepping on to the water, his courageous efforts fizzled in defeat. He found himself in a dangerous duel with the depths of the sea. What was it tha

Israel, Gaza, and the Church- How should we respond?

Daniel 12:1- "At that time shall arise Michael, the great prince who has charge of your people. And there shall be a time of trouble, such as never has been since there was a nation till that time. But at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone whose name shall be found written in the book." The only Nation in the Bible that has an Archangel from Heaven appointed for its protection is the Nation of Israel. This reality reminds us of the extent to which God has gone in order to ensure that His covenant promises to the Jewish people are fulfilled, and also that the conflicts we are seeing in the earthly realm originate in the spiritual realm. God’s unwavering commitment to preserve the Jewish people is not based upon their “deeds of righteousness” but rather upon His covenant promises given to their forefathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Therefore, we must understand that there is a war in the spiritual realm against the covenant promises of God that is manifesting in

A Review of: "Calvinism, Arminianism & The Word of God: A Calvary Chapel Perspective" By: Chuck Smith

Recently a Pastor friend of mine shared with me an article written by the founder of the Calvary Chapel Denomination Chuck Smith. It was written with the intention of addressing the Calvinism vs. Arminianism issue for all of the Calvary Chapel Churches. To see the article CLICK HERE . First of all I like the format of the paper in which he clearly set out to address both views and then clarify the Calvary Chapel stance. A couple of things that I noticed I want to point out below: Overall he did a fair job conveying the Arminian view, however I am not sure why he seemed to be confused on a couple of things he said. Over the year Arminius’ beliefs have been misrepresented and demonized by Calvinists so I can see why he made a few false assumptions regarding their beliefs. 1. He stated, “Arminius believed that the fall of man was not total, maintaining that there was enough good left in man for him to will to accept Jesus Christ unto salvation.” This is actually a descript