Skip to main content

Why "progressive christianity" is an entirely different Religion.

As a pastor, I am deeply concerned about the growing trend of so called "progressive christianity", which seeks to depart from the core beliefs and practices of our faith in favor of a more humanistic and secular worldview. It's imporatant to understand that "progressive christianity" is a completely separate worldview from the Historic Christian Faith and this why I use quotation marks when using the term. By borrowing Christian terminology, concepts, and ecclesiology this worldview has had surprising success at deceiving people to think that it can be considered Christian in the Historic sense of the word. Nothing can be furter from the truth... As I reflect on this issue, I am reminded of several biblical passages that speak to the challenges faced by this worldview. 

One of the main concerns I have with "progressive christianity" is its rejection of the Bible as the infallible Word of God and the final rule of faith for Christian practice and belief. This worldview sees the Bible as nothing more than a product of human invention with a very limited and unclear level of divine inspiration. It values the subjective interpretation of the reader above and beyond the authoritative teaching of Scripture. As the apostle Paul writes in 2 Timothy 3:16-17, "All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work." By rejecting the authority and inspiration of the Bible, activists for "progressive christianity" discard the entire foundation of the Historic Christian Worldview. This alone makes "progressive christianity" an entirely different Religion. 

Similarly, the issue of affiriming the concept of subjective truth and morality is a major challenge for "progressive christianity." As the apostle Peter writes in 2 Peter 1:20-21, "No prophecy of Scripture comes from someone's own interpretation. For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit." By prioritizing individual experience and interpretation over objective truth, activists for "progressive christianity" completely undermine the objective moral order that is grounded in God's nature and revealed through His Word, the Bible.

Furthermore, by rejecting the objective nature of truth and morality, "progressive christianity" endorses a form of relativism that denies the existence of universal moral standards. As the apostle Paul writes in Romans 2:14-15, "For when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that the work of the law is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness, and their conflicting thoughts accuse or even excuse them." In other words, even those who do not have access to the Bible or Christian theology still have an innate sense of moral right and wrong. By rejecting this objective moral order, activists for "progressive christianity" reject Biblical teaching and even worse they reject the very foundation of right and wrong itself. 

Moreover, I am concerned about how "progressive christianity" co-opts Christian language in order to situate secular humanism under the "Christian banner." Even though they reject the authority of Scripture, the reality of sin, and the necessity of salvation through Jesus Christ, they still attempt to persuade people that they are Christian by borrowing our terminology. This is no different than what heretical cult groups like Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses do. Jesus warns us in Matthew 7:15, "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves." By using Christian concepts and terminology to promote a secular humanistic agenda, activists for "progressive christianity" confuse the real message of the Bible and distort the true nature of the Christian faith.

This leads to the heart of the matter... "Progressive christianity" distorts the Gospel by rejecting the idea of sin and the need for salvation. Many activists for "progressive christianity" believe that the traditional Christian concept of sin is outdated and oppressive, and they reject the idea that humanity is inherently sinful and in need of a savior. This perspective ignores the reality of human brokenness and depravity, as well as the biblical teaching that "all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23). By downplaying the seriousness of sin, progressive Christianity also undermines the importance of the cross and the need for Christ's atoning sacrifice. As the apostle Paul writes in 2 Corinthians 5:21, "For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God." The Gospel message of salvation through faith in Christ is essential to the Christian faith, and any attempt to distort or deny it is a serious departure from the truth of Scripture and a sign of grave deception, as the Bible says in Galatians 1:8, "But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed."

Finally, I believe that any departure from historic Christian belief risks undermining the unity and coherence of the faith. As the apostle Paul writes in Ephesians 4:4-6, "There is one body and one Spirit—just as you were called to the one hope that belongs to your call—one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all." By departing from the core beliefs and practices of Christianity, activists for "progressive christianity" instigate apostasy through compromising its essential message.

In conclusion, I believe that "progressive christianity" is an entirely different Religion than Historic Christianity and we must take steps to unite orthodox believers in contending for the faith in our generation. We must be discerning in our engagement with activists for "progressive christianity", aiming to defend the unity and coherence of Historic Christianity in the face of these challenges. As the apostle Paul writes in Colossians 2:8, "See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ." May we always be rooted in Christ and the teachings of His appointed apostles. 


Popular posts from this blog

Can a Christian need Deliverance from Demons?

The question of whether Christians can be demonized and in need of deliverance is a th ought-provoking topic that ignites intense debate within Christian circles. While opinions may differ, this chapter aims to present a comprehensive overview of how Christians can benefit from the ministry of deliverance, supported by scriptural evidence. By delving into biblical passages, studying the original Greek, and examining the theological perspectives surrounding this topic, we can gain a deeper understanding of the possibility of Christians requiring deliverance from demonic influence/oppression. Oftentimes you will hear it said in Christian circles: "a person can either be possessed, oppressed, or influenced by the devil." However, this terminology is not used in the Bible, especially as it relates to the word "possessed." In fact, the Greek word "daimonizomai," used in some Bibles to mean "demon-possessed" is often improperly translated. Scholars ar

What did Jesus say about homosexuality?

Several proponents of the movement to try to make homosexuality compatible with scripture have often claimed that "Jesus did not say anything about homosexuality, therefore it's not something we should forbid in the New Covenant." Is this true? Did Jesus give a free pass on the sin of homosexuality? I would like to start by saying that this approach is both deceptive regarding the teachings of Jesus in His ministry and completely misrepresentative of the doctrine of the scripture's infallibility. Firstly, Jesus explicitly affirmed the Biblical definition of marriage as God's plan for sexually intimate relationships: "‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.’ So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man put asunder" (Mark 10:5-9)" We also find Jesus explicitly condemning all forms of sexual immorality after His resur

A Review of: "Calvinism, Arminianism & The Word of God: A Calvary Chapel Perspective" By: Chuck Smith

Recently a Pastor friend of mine shared with me an article written by the founder of the Calvary Chapel Denomination Chuck Smith. It was written with the intention of addressing the Calvinism vs. Arminianism issue for all of the Calvary Chapel Churches. To see the article CLICK HERE . First of all I like the format of the paper in which he clearly set out to address both views and then clarify the Calvary Chapel stance. A couple of things that I noticed I want to point out below: Overall he did a fair job conveying the Arminian view, however I am not sure why he seemed to be confused on a couple of things he said. Over the year Arminius’ beliefs have been misrepresented and demonized by Calvinists so I can see why he made a few false assumptions regarding their beliefs. 1. He stated, “Arminius believed that the fall of man was not total, maintaining that there was enough good left in man for him to will to accept Jesus Christ unto salvation.” This is actually a descript