Skip to main content

How should Christians respond to "cancel culture?"

With the rise of modern technology and social media platforms in the past decade or so we have seen a vast increase certain ideological groups seeking to cancel, ban, and silence those with different, offensive, or annoying opinions. Most of this has been done in the name of seeking to preserve a "safe environment" for people to engage the internet with less of a risk of being "triggered" by a differing opinion. Though on a historical level the ability to limit certain free speech that incites physical violence or destructive behavior has been pretty much agreed upon by most people. It seems clear that the idea that those who say things which are wrong, offensive, or annoying should be canceled, silenced and sidelined is entirely un-American and ultimately not Christian. 

Cancel culture is demonic and oppressive. It's the same tactic used by the enemy to oppose the gospel around the world. The message of the cross is offensive to those who don't want to admit their need for salvation. If we join a movement of "cancelling that which offends" we will eventually see that very movement seek to cancel the gospel itself. The world wants to cancel Jesus Christ. The Kingdom of God and cancel culture are like oil and water, they don't mix. One proclaims freedom, the other proclaims vigilantism . Believers ought to remain pure from this toxic worldview and instead faithfully proclaim the truth in love. Our message is simple but often offensive: "Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life, no one comes to the Father except through Him (John 14:6)."

Galatians 5:11 NLT- "If I were no longer preaching salvation through the cross of Christ, no one would be offended."

It's true that freedom of speech can be a double-edge sword because someone could use free speech to ridicule and emotionally abuse others. However, we must foster a society of adulthood and maturity in which someone is free to say an offensive statement to us, while at the same time we are able to retain our right to freely refute their bad ideas. If we foster a society where cancel culture rules it may temporarily silence the voice of our opponents, but it will eventually silence our voice to refute their wrong viewpoints in the long run.

Most importantly, Jesus never canceled anyone's ability to question him or say evil things in general. He refuted them instead. Cancel culture appears to practice "intellectual laziness" as it seeks to cancel people with opposing or bad opinions. What we should do instead is diligently show how their claims are false or wrong. Seeking to cancel may reveal that we don't want to do the hard work of self education and logical argumentation. If cancel culture is left to grow, it will eventually seek to cancel even the opinions of those who fostered it in the first place. In general, truth wins out when good dialogue is present... So we must preserve the right for people to discuss and debate topics, even controversial ones, so that truth can ultimately be revealed as a result. Otherwise we have a society that redefines truth through merely canceling their opposition.

Everyone agree that inciting violence or destructive behavior is not acceptable. But banning opposing ideas, even offensive ones will create a world of mono-culture rather than multi-culture. A world of robust, differing, and debatable opinions is a world where the best ideas can compete and rise to the top and human beings can learn from one another. Cancel culture is demonic. Cancel culture is unforgiving. Cancel culture is non-redemptive. Cancel culture represents the opposite of the Kingdom of God where freedom, forgiveness, and redemptive dialogue are the defining principle of everything we do. It's time for all Christians to rise up and speak out against this corrosive worldview that will eventually be the death of us all. May God give us wisdom to preserve the right of free expression for generations to come.

Written by: Kyle Bailey, D.Min.


Popular posts from this blog

The Storm on Your Phone: learning to fix our eyes on Jesus in the age of social media.

Matthew‬ ‭14:25‭-‬31‬ ‭NIV‬- “[25] Shortly before dawn Jesus went out to them, walking on the lake. [26] When the disciples saw him walking on the lake, they were terrified. “It’s a ghost,” they said, and cried out in fear. [27] But Jesus immediately said to them: “Take courage! It is I. Don’t be afraid.” [28] “Lord, if it’s you,” Peter replied, “tell me to come to you on the water.” [29] “Come,” he said. Then Peter got down out of the boat, walked on the water and came toward Jesus. [30] But when he saw the wind, he was afraid and, beginning to sink, cried out, “Lord, save me!” [31] Immediately Jesus reached out his hand and caught him. “You of little faith,” he said, “why did you doubt?” During one of the most climactic moments of Jesus' ministry, the Apostle Peter demonstrated a dazzling expression of faith and power. Moments after stepping on to the water, his courageous efforts fizzled in defeat. He found himself in a dangerous duel with the depths of the sea. What was it tha

Israel, Gaza, and the Church- How should we respond?

Daniel 12:1- "At that time shall arise Michael, the great prince who has charge of your people. And there shall be a time of trouble, such as never has been since there was a nation till that time. But at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone whose name shall be found written in the book." The only Nation in the Bible that has an Archangel from Heaven appointed for its protection is the Nation of Israel. This reality reminds us of the extent to which God has gone in order to ensure that His covenant promises to the Jewish people are fulfilled, and also that the conflicts we are seeing in the earthly realm originate in the spiritual realm. God’s unwavering commitment to preserve the Jewish people is not based upon their “deeds of righteousness” but rather upon His covenant promises given to their forefathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Therefore, we must understand that there is a war in the spiritual realm against the covenant promises of God that is manifesting in

A Review of: "Calvinism, Arminianism & The Word of God: A Calvary Chapel Perspective" By: Chuck Smith

Recently a Pastor friend of mine shared with me an article written by the founder of the Calvary Chapel Denomination Chuck Smith. It was written with the intention of addressing the Calvinism vs. Arminianism issue for all of the Calvary Chapel Churches. To see the article CLICK HERE . First of all I like the format of the paper in which he clearly set out to address both views and then clarify the Calvary Chapel stance. A couple of things that I noticed I want to point out below: Overall he did a fair job conveying the Arminian view, however I am not sure why he seemed to be confused on a couple of things he said. Over the year Arminius’ beliefs have been misrepresented and demonized by Calvinists so I can see why he made a few false assumptions regarding their beliefs. 1. He stated, “Arminius believed that the fall of man was not total, maintaining that there was enough good left in man for him to will to accept Jesus Christ unto salvation.” This is actually a descript