Skip to main content

Why Christianity rejects Jehovah's Witness Theology.

The history of Christianity is littered with debates about how certain ordinances of the church should be performed, how certain theology works itself out logistically, some minor disputes, and some very contentious disputes. Even so it remains true that never within the history of the Christian faith have the foundational beliefs that make Christianity a cohesive religion become altered or abolished by a consensus of believers. Even considering the variety of denominational expressions, each of them at their foundation affirm the historic underlying doctrine regarding God the Father, the nature of Jesus Christ, the Holy Spirit, the salvation that comes through Jesus Christ, and the church at large. 

This cohesive underlying framework is what defines Christianity as comprehensive belief system in general. When a person or group of people claim to be Christian, yet at the same time deny the historical, foundational belief system of Christianity, they in turn remove themselves from the Christian faith as a whole. You wouldn't imagine a person claiming to be Muslim or Jewish yet at the same time denying the core tenants of Islam or Judaism, yet many people consider Jehovah's Witnesses (aka the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania) as nothing more than another denomination of Christianity. This is simply not the case. 

The primary historical documents that define the Christian Faith are the Apostle's Creed and the Nicene Creed, the latter is considered to be more widely emphasized among all Christian denominations. The primary item which the Nicene Creed elaborates on that the Apostle's Creed does not is a deeper level of specificity regarding the deity of Christ (that is, Jesus is God in the flesh). The Apostle's Creed affirms Christ as Messiah, Lord, and the Son of God but does not elaborate specifically on how these attributes correlate with His deity. The Nicene Creed in response to the Arian Controversy, which sought to undermine the doctrine of the deity of Christ, made sure to elaborate further on that which was not a widespread concern to address when the Apostle's Creed was formulated. Essentially, when the Apostle's Creed was created the deity of Christ was not largely in question and therefore the creed did not take time to go into specifics in the same way that the Nicene Creed does at at later date. 

Understanding what these foundational creeds of the Christian Faith affirm is essential in understanding why Jehovah's Witnesses are not considered by consensus to be within the sphere of Historic Christianity. In a nutshell the creeds affirm the following:

1. There is One God comprised of three persons: The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit.

2. Jesus Christ entered into human history by the Holy Spirit through the virgin Mary. 

3. Jesus Christ is the sole provision for the salvation of mankind through His atoning sacrifice on the cross. 

4. Jesus Christ rose from the dead and ascended to the right hand of the Father in Heaven.

5. Jesus Christ will return again to judge mankind and establish His everlasting kingdom.

6. The church is comprised of all believers worldwide and it's ordinances are baptism and communion.

7. The resurrection of the dead is a future event which will be performed by God as something for us to look forward to.

This list is simply to provide my personal summary of the two creeds however it will more than suffice for the purpose of discussing the issue of Jehovah's Witness doctrine. This summary of contradictions between the beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses and the beliefs of historical Christianity will serve to be a quick, straight forward refutation of the assertion that "Jehovah's Witnesses are Christians." Ultimately I intend to show concisely how the core beliefs of Christianity are repetitively violated by the doctrines that are espoused by the Watchtower Bible Tract Society of Pennsylvania.   

Firstly, in exchange for the historical Jesus as described in the Bible and in both foundational creeds of the Christian Faith the Jehovah's Witnesses have asserted a completely different Jesus altogether. Their claim is that Jesus is not God and is rather the "highest created being" namely - Michael the Archangel. This assertion directly contradicts the doctrine of the Deity of Christ which is in all possible regards the most well attested characteristic that makes the Christian view of Jesus distinct from every other World Religion. For example Orthodox Judaism defines Jesus as a 1st century Rabbi accused of blasphemy and Islam defines Jesus as one among many prophets of God. What makes Christianity unique among the conceptions of the person of Jesus Christ is it's assertion that Jesus is the invisible God made visible in human flesh. 

Secondly, Jehovah's Witnesses reject the doctrine of the Trinity. As shown in my summary of the Apostle's and Nicene Creed the doctrine of the Trinity has been core to the Christian Faith since the beginning. Although the word "Trinity" is not used in scripture, the doctrine is formulated from the teachings of scripture as a whole. We use the word "Trinity" to describe the doctrine itself as presented in the Bible and the early creeds of the Christian Church. Christianity has always been historically unique for presenting God as "complex in His unity." The concept of One God in three distinct persons  (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) has been a unique attribute of Christian monotheism from it's very inception and Jehovah's witnesses depart from this foundational teaching completely. 

Thirdly, Jehovah's Witnesses reject the personhood of the Holy Spirit and offer a view which reduces Him to "an impersonal force." The Bible and the early creeds of the Christian Church describe the Holy Spirit with adjectives that unequivocally demonstrate that the Holy Spirit possesses all three qualities of personhood - which are mind, will, and emotions. An impersonal force doesn't think (mind) decide (will) or feel (emotions), yet the Holy Spirit is described as doing all three of these things (see 1 Cor. 2:10-13; 1 Cor. 12:11; Eph. 4:30).

Fourthly, Jehovah's Witnesses reject the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ in exchange for the idea that He rose as a spirit creature and that the material body of Jesus was taken away by God the Father. This belief violates another doctrine that is emphatically central to the Christian Faith as whole. The Bible records the bodily resurrection of Christ in every gospel account as well as throughout the New Testament, and the Apostle's and Nicene Creed both reaffirm this reality as a universal belief of Christianity from it's inception. Nevertheless, Jehovah's Witnesses here offer another of many irreconcilable contradictions to historic Christian belief.  

Finally, it must be said that the information I have provided is by no means a comprehensive analysis of all beliefs that Jehovah's Witnesses hold which are contrary to scripture and thus Christianity as a whole. A brief list of other important contradictions would include things like their belief that Jesus died on a stake instead of a cross, the idea of works-based salvation, that only Jehovah's witnesses will be saved, their beliefs on hell and who the 144,000 witnesses in the book of Revelation are, etc. My intention in this analysis was to provide a refutation to the ideas that Jehovah's Witnesses are within the sphere of historic Christianity, and by comparing their beliefs to those of the early creeds of the Christian Church I believe the information provided here will suffice to that end.

Written by: Kyle Bailey, D.Min.


Popular posts from this blog

Can a Christian need Deliverance from Demons?

The question of whether Christians can be demonized and in need of deliverance is a th ought-provoking topic that ignites intense debate within Christian circles. While opinions may differ, this chapter aims to present a comprehensive overview of how Christians can benefit from the ministry of deliverance, supported by scriptural evidence. By delving into biblical passages, studying the original Greek, and examining the theological perspectives surrounding this topic, we can gain a deeper understanding of the possibility of Christians requiring deliverance from demonic influence/oppression. Oftentimes you will hear it said in Christian circles: "a person can either be possessed, oppressed, or influenced by the devil." However, this terminology is not used in the Bible, especially as it relates to the word "possessed." In fact, the Greek word "daimonizomai," used in some Bibles to mean "demon-possessed" is often improperly translated. Scholars ar

What did Jesus say about homosexuality?

Several proponents of the movement to try to make homosexuality compatible with scripture have often claimed that "Jesus did not say anything about homosexuality, therefore it's not something we should forbid in the New Covenant." Is this true? Did Jesus give a free pass on the sin of homosexuality? I would like to start by saying that this approach is both deceptive regarding the teachings of Jesus in His ministry and completely misrepresentative of the doctrine of the scripture's infallibility. Firstly, Jesus explicitly affirmed the Biblical definition of marriage as God's plan for sexually intimate relationships: "‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.’ So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man put asunder" (Mark 10:5-9)" We also find Jesus explicitly condemning all forms of sexual immorality after His resur

A Review of: "Calvinism, Arminianism & The Word of God: A Calvary Chapel Perspective" By: Chuck Smith

Recently a Pastor friend of mine shared with me an article written by the founder of the Calvary Chapel Denomination Chuck Smith. It was written with the intention of addressing the Calvinism vs. Arminianism issue for all of the Calvary Chapel Churches. To see the article CLICK HERE . First of all I like the format of the paper in which he clearly set out to address both views and then clarify the Calvary Chapel stance. A couple of things that I noticed I want to point out below: Overall he did a fair job conveying the Arminian view, however I am not sure why he seemed to be confused on a couple of things he said. Over the year Arminius’ beliefs have been misrepresented and demonized by Calvinists so I can see why he made a few false assumptions regarding their beliefs. 1. He stated, “Arminius believed that the fall of man was not total, maintaining that there was enough good left in man for him to will to accept Jesus Christ unto salvation.” This is actually a descript